Petitioner filed COPC challenging non-compliance of a previous order regarding pay fixation. Court observed that the previous direction had been complied via a later office order and disposed of the present petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No.1183 of 2026
Date of decision:15.09.2026
Karamjeet Singh ...Petitioner
Versus
Dr. Nipun Jindal & another ...Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge .
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner : Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Parav Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondents : Ms. Shrutika Chauhan, Advocate.
Romesh Verma, Judge (oral):
The instant petition has been filed alleging noncompliance of the judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. 2350 of 2026, dated 02.03.2026.
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
-2-
(Romesh Verma) Judge
15th September, 2026.
(vt)
Karamjeet Singh
Dr. Nipun Jindal
Romesh Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
