This judgment contains no headnote text. It is a one-line order disposing of a contempt petition upon satisfaction that the compliance order has been met.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:HHC:39368 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.1123 of 2026 Date of decision: 15.09.2026
Suresh Kumar ….Petitioner Versus Rahul Kumar and another ….Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J.
Whether approved for reporting ?1
| For the Petitioner: | Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate. |
|---|---|
| For the Respondents: | Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General. |
Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral):
Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly stated that
judgment under reference has been duly complied with and the encroachment stands also removed.
required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge
September 15, 2026 (reena)
1
Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement ?
2
Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:HHC:38264 )
Suresh Kumar
Rahul Kumar
Sushil Kukreja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
