Dismissed¶¶13

Billu Ram v. Kamlesh Kumar Pant and Ors.

Himachal Pradesh HC23 Apr 2026COPC/1094/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Billu Ram v. Kamlesh Kumar and another, COPC No.1094 of 2025, High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla (Sushil Kukreja, Judge; 23.04.2026): contempt petition for willful disobedience of Writ Court judgment dated 22.07.2025 in CWP No.7024 of 2023 dismissed after court found the judgment complied with; notice discharged; liberty reserved to petitioner to pursue remedy regarding allegedly only notional benefits granted on regularization.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; petition dismissed and notice discharged, with liberty reserved to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law, if still aggrieved. ¶¶13

Billu Ram Vs Kamlesh Kumar Pant and Ors. — Himachal Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶3

COPC No.1094 of 2025 Date of Decision: 23.04.2026
____________________________________________________ Billu Ram ....Petitioner Versus Kamlesh Kumar and another …Respondents _____________________________________________________ Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?¹
________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr.Devender Kumar, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ____________________________________________________

¶4

_____________________________________________________ Billu Ram ....Petitioner Versus
Kamlesh Kumar and another …Respondents
_____________________________________________________ Coram

¶5

Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral)

¶6

The present contempt petition has been filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the judgment dated 22.07.2025, passed by the learned Writ Court in CWP No.7024 of 2023 .

¶7

In the compliance affidavit filed by the respondents, it has been stated that the respondents have complied with judgment dated 22.07.2025 in its true letter and spirit and there is no willful, deliberate or intentional disobedience on their part.

¶8

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and

¶9

have also gone through the record carefully.

¶10

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶11

¶12

Perusal of the record reveals that the judgment

¶13

under reference has been complied with by the respondents. Therefore, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the same is dismissed accordingly. Notice discharged.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that

¶15

while regularizing the services of the petitioners, only notional benefits have been granted.

¶16

Therefore, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law, if he is still aggrieved.

¶17

( Sushil Kukreja )

¶18

April 23, 2026 Judge

¶19

(V. Himalvi)

Billu Ram v. Kamlesh Kumar Pant and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Billu Ram v. Kamlesh Kumar Pant and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Land Acquisition Colllector Hppwd Vs Amar Singh and another

State of Hp and Others Vs Chain Singh and others

Vijay Kumar Juneja Vs State of Hp

Sumit Kumar Vs Rajinder Kumar

Madhu Bala and Others Vs Rakesh Kanwar and Another

Amit Kumar Vs Rajinder Kumar