The single judge closed contempt proceedings against the respondent, discharged the notice issued to him, and reserved liberty for the petitioner to approach the law for redressal of grievances.
Notice issued to respondent is discharged; proceeding closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No. 1070/2026 Decided on: 15.09.2026
Nitin Kumar …Petitioner
Versus
Ashish Kumar .…Respondent.
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner: Mr. Pranav Kaushal, Advocate, vice Mr. Amit Kumar Dhumal, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Rajat Choudhary, Deputy Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
Learned Assistant Advocate General has placed on
record office instructions dated 14.09.2026 along with consideration order of the even date.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge
15th September, 2026(rohit)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
Nitin Kumar
Ashish Kumar
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
