The petition became infructuous after the petitioners appeared before the Executing Court on 11.09.2026. The court disposed of the petition and any pending applications.
Petition and pending applications disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CMPMO No. 526/2026 Decided on: 16.09.2026
Col. Vikram Singh (deceased)
through his legal representatives & ors. …..Petitioners
Versus
Shrikant Krishan & ors. ….Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioners: Mr. Ajay Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gautam Sood, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. R. K. Gautam, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Jai Ram Sharma, Advocate.
Romesh Verma, Judge (oral)
In view of copy of order, dated 11.09.2026, as placed on record by the learned senior counsel for the respondents, whereby present petitioners have put in appearance on 11.09.2026 before the Executing Court, the instant petition has become infructuous and is disposed of as such. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(Romesh Verma) 16.09.2026 Judge (pankaj)
1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
Col. Vikram Singh (deceased) through his legal representatives & ors.
Shrikant Krishan & ors.
Romesh Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
