The High Court dismissed the petition as having abated against the respondent, who had died before the order date, noting that legal representatives were not brought on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2025:HHC:42785
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CMPMO No.296 of 2025 Decided on: 10.12.2025
| ____________________________________________________ State of H.P. and others ……….. petitioners |
|---|
| Versus Rameshwar Dass ……….respondent |
| ____________________________________________________ Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 |
| For the petitioners : Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General. |
| For the respondent : Nemo. |
| ____________________________________________________ **Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (**oral) |
The death of Respondent was noticed in the order dated 21.07.2025 based on the service report. Till date, the legal representatives of the respondent have not been brought on record. Abatement on account of operation of law in the present case is automatic.
(Bipin Chander Negi) Judge
10th December 2025 Tarun
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition stands dismissed as the cause of action has abated due to the death of the respondent.
State of H.P. and others
Rameshwar Dass (deceased) / Legal Representatives
Bipin Chander Negi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
