Rajiv Kuar Bansal and Another v. Prakash Chand Bansal and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC22 Jun 2026CMPMO/135/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CMPMO No.135 of 2026; Rajiv Kumar Bansal & another v. Prakash Chand Bansal & others; petition withdrawn with liberty to avail appropriate remedy; appeal under Section 96 CPC before District Judge, Sirmaur at Nahan finally disposed of; release of Rs.2,00,000/- Registry deposit (deposited 17.04.2026 per order of 09.04.2026) with interest to petitioners' savings bank accounts; High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla; Romesh Verma, Judge; decided 22.06.2026.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of the petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy under the relevant provisions of law; release of the Rs.2,00,000/- Registry deposit along with interest in favour of the petitioners by remittance to their savings bank accounts, particulars to be furnished by Mr. Karan Sharma within three days. ¶10-11

Rajiv Kuar Bansal and Another Vs Prakash Chand Bansal and Others — Himachal Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶10-11

Ratio / Principle

Permission granted to the petitioners to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy under the relevant provisions of law, since their appeal under Section 96 of CPC before the District Judge, Sirmaur at Nahan had been finally disposed of and nothing survived in the petition.

¶8

Key takeaways

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn along with pending application(s), if any.ratio¶10-11
The Court ordered that the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- deposited in the Registry on 17.04.2026 pursuant to the Court's order of 09.04.2026, along with interest, be released in favour of the petitioners by remitting the same to their savings bank accounts, particulars to be furnished by Mr. Karan Sharma, learned counsel, within three days.ratio¶14

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla (Romesh Verma, J.), CMPMO No.135 of 2026, decided 22.06.2026 — Rajiv Kumar Bansal & another v. Prakash Chand Bansal & others. Counsel for the petitioners contended that their appeal under Section 96 of CPC before the District Judge, Sirmaur at Nahan, H.P. had been finally disposed of and nothing survived in the present petition; permission was granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy under the relevant provisions of law, and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn along with pending application(s), if any. The sum of Rs.2,00,000/- deposited in the Registry of this Court on 17.04.2026 in sequel to the Court's order of 09.04.2026 was ordered to be released, along with interest, in favour of the petitioners by remitting the same to their savings bank accounts, particulars to be furnished by Mr. Karan Sharma, learned counsel, within three days.

¶1

2026:HHC:24130

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No.135 of 2026 Decided on: 22.06.2026

¶3

Rajiv Kumar Bansal & another	….Petitioners
Versus
Prakash Chand Bansal & others	...Respondents

¶4

Coram

¶5

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge Whether approved for reporting?

¶6

For the petitioners:	Mr. Anand Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondents:	Mr. Ashok K. Tyagi, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4(a) to 4(c).

¶7

Romesh Verma, Judge (Oral)

¶8

It is contended by learned senior counsel for the petitioners that an appeal filed by the present petitioners under Section 96 of CPC before the District Judge, Sirmaur at Nahan, H.P. has been finally disposed of. He further submits that now nothing survives in the present petition, and he shall be availing appropriate remedy under the relevant provisions of law. Consequently, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy under the relevant provisions of law. Permission granted.

¶9

2 2026:HHC:24130

¶10

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as

¶11

withdrawn along with pending application(s), if any.

¶12

Learned senior counsel submits that in sequel to

¶13

order as passed by this court on 09.04.2026, his client has deposited a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- in the Registry of this Court on 17.04.2026. He submits that the said amount, along with interest, may be ordered to be released in favour of the petitioners by remitting the same in their saving bank accounts, particulars whereof shall be furnished by Mr. Karan

¶14

Sharma, learned counsel, within a period of three days from today. Ordered accordingly.

¶15

( Romesh Verma ) Judge

¶16

June 22, 2026 (vt)

Rajiv Kuar Bansal and Another v. Prakash Chand Bansal and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajiv Kuar Bansal and Another v. Prakash Chand Bansal and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.C. Shimla Vs Mahesh Sood deceased through Lrs. Smt. Asha Sood

Krishani Vs Pawan Kumar

Rajni Devi Vs Rohit

Chaman Lal and Ors. Vs UOI and Others

The H.P. State Cooperative Agriculture and Rural Development Bank and Another Vs Manish Kumar and Others

Mohan Dutt Vs Lok Nath and Others