Single judge order allowing an applicant to place objections to an inquiry report on record in a departmental inquiry matter, stating no prejudice would be caused to the respondent.
Objections filed to the inquiry report ordered to be taken on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sahi Ram vs. HPSEB
CWPOA No.1658 of 2019
15.09.2026
Present: Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Advocate vice Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Harshita Dogra and Ms. Manish Kumari, Advocates for the respondent.
CMP-T No.287 of 2026
By way of present application, the
applicant/petitioner has prayed for placing on record the objections to the inquiry report.
parties and also perused the record carefully.
application is allowed and the objections filed to the inquiry report are ordered to be taken on record.
CWPOA No.1658 of 2019
List for consideration on 6th October, 2026.
15th September, 2026 ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (naveen) Judge
Sahi Ram
HPSEB
Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
