The single judge dismissed an application filed by the applicant for an early hearing of a pending writ petition (CWP No. 4472 of 2025), noting that the petition was admitted recently and offering no plausible reason for urgency.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Ajit Kumar Thakur & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors.
CMP No.23653 of 2026 in CWP No.4472 of 2025
Item No. P-18 15.09.2026 Present: Mr. Adarsh Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner.
None for respondent No.1.
Mr. Gobind Korla, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.2 to 4.
The applicant/petitioner has filed the present application for early hearing of the main petition. Keeping in view the fact that the petition was admitted on 13.05.2025, no plausible reason is made out at this stage for allowing the application. The application is accordingly dismissed.
( G.S. Sandhawalia ) Chief Justice
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) 15th September, 2026 Judge (Anurag)
Ajit Kumar Thakur
Union of India
Ors.
G.S. Sandhawalia
Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
