The court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the CMP application with liberty to file afresh, acknowledging the stay on the judgment in Ghanshyam's case which prevented passing orders.
Permission to withdraw the application with liberty to file afresh
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MANOJ KUMAR BANSAL AND ORS Versus REKESH KANWAR AND ORS
CMP-22799 of 2026 in COPC - 1431 of 2025
15.09.2026
Present: Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondents-State.
While placing on record communication dated nil issued under the signatures of Director School Education, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that since judgment passed in Ghanshyam’s case has been stayed, no order can be passed in terms of judgment alleged to have been violated in the instant proceedings.
Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly
acknowledges factum of stay of the judgment passed in Ghanshyam’s case and accordingly, she seeks permission to withdraw the present application with liberty to file afresh at appropriate stage. Ordered accordingly.
(Sandeep Sharma), Judge
September 15, 2026
(Sunil)
Manoj Kumar Bansal and Ors
Rekesh Kanwar and Ors
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
