Court disposed of a contempt application noting a stay order by the Supreme Court in a connected batch; no further orders required at present pending revival of the main petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Indu Bala Vs. Rakesh Kanwar & anr.
CMP No.21547 of 2026 in COPC No.1534 of 2025
15.09.2026 Present:
Ms. Anjana, Advocate, vice Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents.
Learned Additional Advocate General has placed
on record communication dated nil, alongwith copy of order dated 02.09.2006, passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).27726-27779/2024, titled State of HP & ors. Vs. Sanjay Kumar , wherein the contempt proceedings have been ordered to be stayed.
Therefore, in view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present application, at this stage and, accordingly, the same is disposed of.
However, the applicant/petitioner is at liberty to revive
the contempt petition as and when the occasion arises to do so.
( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge
September 15, 2026
(V.Himalvi)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of HP & ors. Vs. Sanjay KumarReferred¶7
Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).27726-27779/2024, titled State of HP & ors. Vs. Sanjay Kumar
Indu Bala
Rakesh Kanwar
Unknown Respondent II
Sushil Kukreja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
