The court granted a request to condone a 65-day delay in filing an appeal and disposed of the application. The appeal was subsequently registered and listed for further proceedings.
Condonation of 65-day delay; application disposed; appeal registered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Ram Lal Thakur vs. Satluj Jal Vidhut Nigam Ltd. CMP(M) No.1492 of 2026
Item No.P-2
15.09.2026 Present:
Mr. Ashwani Pathak, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dev Raj, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
CMP(M) No.1492 of 2026
Keeping in view the averments made in the
application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of the official, delay of 65 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
LPA No._____of 2026
Appeal be registered.
Counsel for the appellant submits that in the
matter referred to in the writ petition, under appeal i.e. CWP No.3212 of 2026, titled, Lal Chand Shastri vs. Union of India
and others , decided on 19.03.2026, separate LPAs have been filed.
It is pointed out that another case, namely, Meher Dutt Gaur, would also come up for consideration.
Office to trace the LPAs and place them on
record after removal of objection(s), if any and list the matter on 07.10.2026.
Details be supplied to the office also.
List on 07.10.2026.
( G.S. Sandhawalia ) Chief Justice
September 15, 2026 ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) ( ankit) Judge
Ram Lal Thakur
Satluj Jal Vidhut Nigam Ltd.
G. S. Sandhawalia
Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
