High Court of Himachal Pradesh — September 2026

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWPOA No.404 of 2020 Decided on: 17.09.2026 __________________________________________________________ Mahesh Kumar ...Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation ...Respondents Through its

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.413 of 2024 Decided on: 17.09.2026 _________________________________________________________________ Susheel Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of HP and Ors …Respondents ______________________

COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA RSA No. 158 of 2008 Date of Decision : 17.9.2026 Lokender Kumar & ors. ....Appellants Versus State of H.P. and ors. ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for rep

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Appeal No. 47 of 2014 Reserved on: 9.9.2026 Date of Decision: 17.09.2026. State of H.P. ...Appellant Versus Santosh ...Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved f

COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Appeal No. 72 of 2014 Reserved on: 10.09.2014 Date of Decision: 17.09.2026. State of H.P. ...Appellant Versus Surjit Kumar ...Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved

) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Appeal No. 41 of 2024 Reserved on: 10.09.2026 Date of Decision: 17.09.2026 Uploaded on: 17.09.2026 Pradeep Kumar ...Appellant Versus State of H.P. ...Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Ch

COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Appeal No. 114 of 2025 Date of decision: 17.09.2026 ________________________________________________________________________________ Prem Singh …Appellant Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent

Jagdish OMP(M) No. 212 of 2026 17.09.2026 Present: Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, vice counsel, for the applicant. Mr. Yuyutsu Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent. OMP(M) No. 212 of 2026 The present application has been filed for condona

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA RFA No. 163 of 2017 Reserved on: 10.09.2026 Date of decision:17.09.2026 Vidya Devi ...Appellant Versus State of H.P. & another ...Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA RFA No. 121 of 2017 Reserved on: 10.09.2026 Date of decision:17.09.2026 Mangat Ram ...Appellant Versus State of H.P. & another ...Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether

COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.3689 of 2024 Decided on: 17th September, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rachhpal Singh Dadhwal …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and anoth

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.905 of 2026 Decided on: 17 th September, 2026 ___________________________________________________________________ Varun Sayal ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & another

COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA LPA No. 252 of 2026 Decided on : 17.09.2026 The State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Appellants Versus Sh. Mahesh Ram and another …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justic

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWPOA No.6009 of 2020 a /w CWPOA No.6024 of 2020 Decided on: 17th September, 2026 1. CWPOA No.6009 of 2020 Vineet Kumar ....Petitioner versus State of H.P. and others ...Respondents 2. CWPOA No

COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.1829 of 2016 Date of Decision: 17.9.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Subhash Sharma ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …....Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWPOA No.6009 of 2020 a /w CWPOA No.6024 of 2020 Decided on: 17th September, 2026 1. CWPOA No.6009 of 2020 Vineet Kumar ....Petitioner versus State of H.P. and others ...Respondents 2. CWPOA No

COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MMO No. 299 of 2026 Date of Decision : 17.9.2026 Mukesh Sharma ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & anr. ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA RFA No. 217 of 2017 Reserved on: 10.09.2026 Date of decision:17.09.2026 Sant Ram Sharma ...Appellant Versus State of H.P. & another ...Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Ju

COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MP(M) No. 520 of 2026 Reserved on: 11.9.2026 Decided on: 17.9.2026 Rattan Lal …. Petitioner Versus State of HP …. Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporti

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1146 of 2026 Decided on: 17 th September, 2026 ___________________________________________________________________ Mohd. Islam ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Appeal No. 4088 of 2013 Reserved on: 10.09.2026 Date of Decision: 17.09.2026. State of H.P. ...Appellant Versus Shambhu ...Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approv

vs Chetan Chauhan Cr. Appeal No. 342 of 2015 17.09.2026 Present: None for the appellant. Ms. Bhagya Rani, Advocate, for the respondent. Perusal of the record reveals that on 22.05.2026, neither the appellant appeared nor any representation

COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Civil Writ Petition No.7504 of 2026 Date of Decision: 17.09.2026 ____________________________________________________________________ Sh. Basant Singh ……...Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Others …....Re

COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.4804 of 2024 Decided on: 17th September, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Manohar Lal and others …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and othe

SHARMA Versus SMILY MAHAJAN CMP.M-1005 of 2026 17.09.2026 Present: Ms. Drishti Sirswal, Advocate, for the applicant. Ms. Heena Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondent. CMP.M-1005 of 2026 By way of instant application filed under Section 5 of