Nand Lal v. Hrtc and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Himachal Pradesh High Court, Shimla; Execution Petition No.659 of 2025 in CWP No.3769 of 2024; Nand Lal v. Himachal Road Transport Corporation & others; Justice Ajay Mohan Goel; decided 06.06.2025; respondents' counsel undertaking to comply with judgment within two weeks; statement taken on record; proceedings closed; liberty to petitioner to seek revival by application; Registry not to insist on affidavit; pending miscellaneous applications disposed of.
What did the court decide?
Execution proceedings closed on the strength of respondents' counsel's recorded statement that the judgment in issue will be complied with within two weeks, with liberty to the petitioner to seek revival by an appropriate application (which the Registry shall not insist be accompanied by the petitioner's affidavit) if needful is not done within two weeks; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, disposed of.