Case brief
What is this about?
Satya Pal Chauhan v. The State of Himachal Pradesh and others, Exe. Pt. No. 1678 of 2025, High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla, decided 02.09.2025 by Justice Ajay Mohan Goel (oral order). Execution petition seeking compliance with a prior judgment ('the judgment in issue'); Additional Advocate General Pushpinder Jaswal accepted notice and undertook compliance within three weeks; proceedings closed with liberty to revive without affidavit; no statute or precedent discussed.
What did the court decide?
Proceedings closed on the strength of the State's undertaking to comply with the judgment in issue within three weeks; liberty reserved to the petitioner to seek revival by an appropriate application (without insistence on affidavit) if compliance is not effected within that period. ¶15