Disposed¶13

Guru Dev v. the State of Hp and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC8 Oct 2025EX.P./1631/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Guru Dev versus State of H.P. & Ors.; Ex. Pet No.1631 of 2025; High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla; decided 08.10.2025; Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua; execution petition; compliance affidavit; Registry; order dated 19.08.2025; consideration order; surviving grievance; liberty reserved; miscellaneous applications disposed; petitioner's counsel Rajat Kumar; L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General for respondents.

What did the court decide?

Liberty reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy, in accordance with law, for the redressal of his surviving grievance, including against the consideration order; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. ¶13

Guru Dev Vs the State of Hp and Others — Himachal Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA

¶2

Ex. Pet No.1631 of 2025 Decided on: 08.10.2025

¶3

________________________________________ Guru Dev Versus	_________________________ ....Petitioner
State of H.P. & Ors.	…Respondents
________________________________________ Coram	_________________________

¶4

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

¶5

1 Whether approved for reporting?

¶6

_________________________ For the petitioner:	________________________________________ Mr. Rajat Kumar, Advocate.
For the respondents:	Mr. L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General.

¶7

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

¶8

Learned Additional Advocate General submits that compliance affidavit has been filed in the Registry of this Court, however, a copy thereof, has been made available for perusal. In terms of the compliance affidavit, respondents have decided the case of the petitioner vide order dated 19.08.2025.

¶9

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner acknowledges the above fact.

¶10

3. In view of above, this execution petition is

¶11

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes

¶12

¶13

disposed of. Liberty, however, is reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy, in accordance with law, for the redressal of his surviving grievance, including against the consideration order.

¶14

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

¶15

Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge

¶16

October 08, 2025 R.Atal

Guru Dev v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Guru Dev v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashwani Kumar and Ors. Vs Rakesh Kanwar and Ors.

Saroj Kumari W/O Sh. Kirti Naresh, aged 44 years Vs M. Sudha Devi

Himland Executive Residences (Himland Housing P Ltd) Vs Dilip Kumar and Ors.

Mukand Lal Vs State of Hp and Others

Doulat Ram Vs the Hpsebl and Others

Asha Kumari Vs the State of Hp and Another