Compliance petition: the respondents filed a compliance report showing the Court's earlier judgment was duly complied with. The petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the consideration order in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 2025:HHC:9533 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Ex. Petition No.1260 of 2024 Decided on: 7th April, 2025
Dev Dutt Saini
.......Petitioner
versus
State of H.P and another
...Respondents
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
For the petitioner: Mr. Surinder Prakash Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G with Mr.Ramakant Sharma, Addl. A.G and Ms.Sharmila Patial, Addl. A.G.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
A perusal of the compliance report filed by the respondents goes to indicate that the judgment passed by this Court has been duly complied with, as is evident from the order annexed with the compliance report dated 12.08.2021.
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
( 2025:HHC:9533 )
( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) Judge
April 07, 2025 ( Sushil Kukreja ) (naveen) Judge
Dev Dutt Saini
State of H.P
another
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Sushil Kukreja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
