Disposed¶15

Rup Singh (Roop Singh) v. State of Hp and Ors.

Himachal Pradesh HC20 Aug 2025EX.P./1138/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Execution petition; compliance with judgment; three-week deadline; direction to comply in letter and spirit; liberty to apply for revival of proceedings; Rup Singh (Roop Singh) v. State of H.P. and others; Additional Advocate General Pushpender Jaswal accepts notice; Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge; High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla; decided 20.08.2025; oral order; no statute or precedent cited; no monetary amount involved.

What did the court decide?

Proceedings closed with a direction to the respondents to comply with the judgment passed by this Court in letter and spirit within three weeks; liberty reserved to the petitioner to file an application for revival of the proceedings in case of non-compliance. ¶15

Rup Singh (Roop Singh) Vs State of Hp and Ors. — Himachal Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶15

Issue for consideration

Whether the respondents should be directed to comply with the judgment earlier passed by this Court, within a stipulated period of three weeks, and with liberty to the petitioner to seek revival of the proceedings in case of non-compliance.

¶15

Court's answer

Taking on record the Additional Advocate General's statement that the judgment in issue shall be complied with within three weeks, the Court closed these proceedings with a direction to the respondents to comply with the judgment passed by this Court in letter and spirit within a period of three weeks.

¶15

Ratio / Principle

In default of compliance with the judgment within three weeks, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file an application for revival of these proceedings.

¶15

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla — Exe. Pet. No. 1138 of 2025, decided on 20.08.2025 (oral order) by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Execution petition by Rup Singh (Roop Singh) against the State of H.P. and others seeking compliance with a judgment earlier passed by this Court (the underlying judgment is not identified in the order). Notice was accepted by Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, for the respondents, who submitted that the judgment in issue shall be complied with within three weeks. Taking the statement on record, the Court closed the proceedings with a direction to the respondents to comply with the judgment in letter and spirit within three weeks, failing which liberty was reserved to the petitioner to file an application for revival of the proceedings. Counsel: Ms. Babita Kumari, Advocate (vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate) for the petitioner. Carries the standard 'Whether approved for reporting?' query regarding reporters of local papers.

¶1

2025:HHC:28153

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶3

Exe. Pet. No. 1138 of 2025 Decided on: 20.08.2025

¶4

Rup Singh (Roop Singh) … Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of H.P. and others

¶7

… Respondents

¶8

Coram

¶9

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.

¶10

Whether approved for reporting?¹

¶11

____________________________ For the petitioner :	_______________________________________ Ms. Babita Kumari, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate.
For the respondents :	Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge	( Oral)

¶12

Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate

¶13

General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶14

Learned Additional Advocate General submits that the judgment in issue shall be complied with within a period of three weeks from today.

¶15

By taking his statement of record, these proceedings are closed, with direction to the respondents to comply with the judgment passed by this Court in letter and spirit within a period of three weeks from today, failing which liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file an application for revival of these proceedings.

¶16

(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 20, 2025 ( narender )

¶17

1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

Rup Singh (Roop Singh) v. State of Hp and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rup Singh (Roop Singh) v. State of Hp and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Daulat Ram Vs Inder Singh

M/S Sanjay Verma Ajay Verma Vishal Thakur Vs the State of Hp and Others

Sarita Devi Vs State of Hp and Others

Davinder Sharma Vs the State of Hp and Others

Pushpa Devi Roach Vs the State of Hp and Others

Parkash Vs the State of Hp and Others