Disposed¶19

Chander Prakash v. State of Hp and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC13 Aug 2025EX.P./1084/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Himachal Pradesh High Court, Shimla; Exe. Pt. No. 1084 of 2025; Chander Prakash vs State of Himachal Pradesh; execution petition; compliance with judgment in issue; statement of Additional Advocate General (Pushpinder Jaswal); three-week compliance period; proceedings closed with liberty to revive; exemption from affidavit for revival application; decided 13.08.2025 by Justice Ajay Mohan Goel; 2025:HHC:27323.

What did the court decide?

Execution proceedings closed in terms of the Additional Advocate General's statement that the judgment in issue will be complied with within three weeks; petitioner given liberty to seek revival by an appropriate application (not requiring an affidavit) if compliance is not made within that period; pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, disposed of accordingly. ¶19

Chander Prakash Vs State of Hp and Others — Himachal Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶19

Issue for consideration

Whether the respondents would comply with 'the judgment in issue' within three weeks, permitting the Court to close the execution proceedings with liberty to the petitioner to seek revival if compliance is not effected.

¶14

Court's answer

On the learned Additional Advocate General's statement that the judgment in issue would be complied with within three weeks from the date of the order, the Court took his statement on record and passed further orders on that basis.

¶14

Ratio / Principle

In view of the compliance statement, the execution proceedings were closed, with liberty reserved to the petitioner to seek revival by filing an appropriate application if needful is not done within three weeks by the Authority concerned.

¶15

Key takeaways

The Registry was directed not to insist upon any revival application being accompanied by the affidavit of the petitioner.ratio¶19

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Execution Petition (Exe. Pt. No. 1084 of 2025), High Court of Himachal Pradesh, decided 13.08.2025 by Ajay Mohan Goel, J. (oral order): Chander Prakash v. State of Himachal Pradesh and others. The learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents accepted notice and stated that the judgment in issue would be complied with within three weeks; his statement was taken on record. In view thereof, the execution proceedings were closed with liberty to the petitioner to seek revival by an appropriate application if compliance was not effected within three weeks by the Authority concerned, and the Registry was directed not to insist upon such an application being accompanied by the petitioner's affidavit. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stood disposed of accordingly. No statutory provisions or precedents were cited in the order.

Chander Prakash v. State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chander Prakash v. State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh Kumar Vs State of Hp and Others

Subash Kumar Vs Rakesh Kanwar and Others

Sunder Singh Vs Dassi Devi

Hari Chand Vs State of Hp and Other

Bhani Ram Vs Raj Kumar and Others

Gopal Sood Vs Poonam Jaswal