Ajay Kumar v. the Hpsebl and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Keywords: HPSEBL (Revised Pay) Regulation 2022; equal pay matrix; Helper (Sub Station); Level-7 pay matrix Rs.28400-92200; representations Annexure P-8/P-6 dated 11.01.2015 / 11.01.2025; direction to decide representations in accordance with law within six weeks; decision to be communicated; writ petitions disposed of without examining merits; pending miscellaneous applications disposed. Petitioners: Swaroop Kumar, Tilak Raj, Kamal Kumar, Kamal Dhiman, Ayub Sharma, Rakesh Kumar, Ajay Kumar, Navdeep Sharma, Harsh Vardhan, Labbu. Respondents: HPSEB Limited and another. Counsel: Bonit Thakur (vice A.K. Gupta) for petitioners; Virender Singh Kanwar, Standing Counsel, for respondents. Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla; Judge: Jyotsna Rewal Dua; decided 2 June 2025.
What did the court decide?
Direction to respondent No.1/competent authority to consider and decide the petitioners' representations dated 11.01.2025 (Annexure P-8/P-6) in accordance with law within six weeks and to communicate the decision to the petitioners; pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also disposed of.