Nand Lal v. the Hpsfc and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Regularization; work charge status; eight years of service; incidental benefits; H.P. State Forest Corporation / H.P. State Forest Development Corporation; State of Himachal Pradesh v. Surajmani (Civil Appeal No.1595 of 2025, decided 06.02.2025); CWP Nos.7428, 7430, 7432 & 7434 of 2025; writ petitions disposed of with direction to competent authority to consider cases per Surajmani within six weeks; Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua; Himachal Pradesh High Court.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider the respective cases of the petitioners in accordance with the law laid down in Surajmani and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within six weeks, with copies of such orders to be communicated to the petitioners; the actual grant of work charge status/regularization was left to the competent authority's consideration rather than granted directly by this Court.