Writ petition disposed of as infructuous after petitioner's counsel stated that subsequent developments had rendered it unnecessary. No issue of law or fact was examined, no finding recorded, and no relief granted beyond closing the proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2025:HHC:823
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 690 of 2024
Date of Decision: 04.01.2025
____________ ___________________________________________ Kishori Lal …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & another … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.1. Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India, for respondent No.2. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral):
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, states
that present petition has been rendered infructuous on account of subsequent development and as such, same may be disposed of accordingly.
(Sandeep Sharma), Judge
January 04, 2025 (shankar)
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Kishori Lal
State of Himachal Pradesh
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
