Sukh Dass v. the State of Hp and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Pension release mandamus; writ under Article 226 dismissed-route disposal for want of prior representation; petitioner allowed two weeks to file representation; competent authority to decide per law in four weeks and communicate; Himachal Pradesh HC; single judge Jyotsna Rewal Dua; CWP 560/2025; decided 08.01.2025.
What did the court decide?
Petition disposed of with liberty/direction: petitioner to prefer a representation within two weeks; if so preferred, the competent authority to consider and decide it in accordance with law within a further four weeks and communicate the order to the petitioner. ¶¶24