Disposed¶11

Dinesh Kumar v. State of Hp and Ors.

Himachal Pradesh HC14 May 2025CWP/5452/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Himachal Pradesh High Court, Shimla; oral order dated 14.05.2025 by Sandeep Sharma, Judge; batch withdrawal of seven CWPs of 2022 (Nos.4973, 5022, 5023, 5229, 5452, 5458, 7087); petitioners Tulsi Prakash, Seva Dass, Surender Singh, Surender Kumar, Dinesh Kumar, Roshan Lal, Keshav Ram v. State of Himachal Pradesh and Others; petitions permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file afresh; pending applications disposed of; no substantive ruling, no statutory references, no case citations.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to withdraw the petitions with permission to file afresh, if required and desired; pending application(s), if any, disposed of. ¶11

Dinesh Kumar Vs State of Hp and Ors. — Himachal Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶2

CWP No.4973 of 2022 with CWP Nos.5022, 5023, 5229, 5452, 5458 and 7087 of 2022 Date of Decision: 14.05.2025

¶3

____________________________________ 1. CWP No.4973 of 2022	___________________
Tulsi Prakash Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Others	…….Petitioner ….Respondents
____________________________________ 2. CWP No.5022 of 2022	___________________
Seva Dass Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Others	…….Petitioner ….Respondents
____________________________________ 3. CWP No.5023 of 2022	___________________
Surender Singh Versus	…….Petitioner
State of Himachal Pradesh and Others	….Respondents
____________________________________ 4. CWP No.5229 of 2022	___________________
Surender Kumar Versus	…….Petitioner
State of Himachal Pradesh and Others	….Respondents
____________________________________ 5. CWP No.5452 of 2022	___________________
Dinesh Kumar Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Others	…….Petitioner ….Respondents
____________________________________ 6. CWP No.5458 of 2022	___________________
Roshan Lal Versus	…….Petitioner
State of Himachal Pradesh and Others	….Respondents
____________________________________ 7. CWP No.7087 of 2022	___________________
Keshav Ram Versus	…….Petitioner
State of Himachal Pradesh and Others ____________________________________	….Respondents ___________________

¶4

¶5

Coram:

¶6

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.

¶7

Whether approved for reporting?¹

¶8

For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Vinay Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner(s), in CWP Nos.4973, 5022, 5023, 5229 and 7087 of 2022. Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioner(s), in CWP Nos.5452 and 5458 of 2022. For the Respondents : Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for State. Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.3, in all the petitions. Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate, for respondent Nos.4 and 5, in all the petitions.

¶9

____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral):

¶10

Learned counsel representing the petitioner(s) seeks

¶11

permission to withdraw the present petitions, with liberty to file afresh, if required and desired. Ordered accordingly.

¶12

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶13

(Sandeep Sharma), Judge

¶14

May 14, 2025

¶15

(Rajeev Raturi)

¶16

1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

Dinesh Kumar v. State of Hp and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh Kumar v. State of Hp and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tara Chand Vs the State of Hp and Others

Fateh Singh Vs the Hrtc and Others

Gian Chand Vs the State of Hp and Others

Poonam Sharma Vs the State of Hp and Others

Suman Kumari Vs the State of Hp and Others

Dhan Bahadur Vs the State of Hp and Others