Rajender Singh v. State of Hp and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Consent-based disposal of a writ petition without adjudicating merits; operative direction is a time-bound consideration of the petitioner's representation (six weeks) in light of Taj Mohammad v. State of Himachal Pradesh, CWP No. 2004 of 2017 (decided 3.8.2023), with a mandatory opportunity of hearing and a speaking order, and liberty reserved for further proceedings. Search terms: representation; direction to decide representation; Taj Mohammad; disposal without merits; opportunity of hearing; speaking order; liberty reserved; CWP No.4039 of 2025; Sandeep Sharma, J.; Himachal Pradesh High Court.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the respondents to consider and decide the petitioner's representation (to be filed within one week) expeditiously, preferably within six weeks, in light of Taj Mohammad, after affording an opportunity of hearing and passing a speaking order; liberty reserved to the petitioner to pursue further appropriate proceedings; pending applications, if any, disposed of.