Disposed¶14

Nand Lal v. State of Hp and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC6 Aug 2025CWP/2729/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CWP No.2729 of 2025; Nand Lal v. State of Himachal Pradesh & others; High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla; decided 06.08.2025 by Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral); disposal in terms of earlier Co-ordinate Bench judgment dated 23.07.2025 in CWP No. 3168 of 2025, Harish Kumar and others v. State of Himachal Pradesh and others; directions applied mutatis mutandis; respondents to decide petitioner's case accordingly; no statute cited; no quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of in terms of the Co-ordinate Bench judgment in Harish Kumar (CWP No. 3168 of 2025, dated 23.07.2025): its directions made applicable mutatis mutandis, with respondents to decide the petitioner's case in light of that judgment; pending application(s), if any, also disposed of. ¶14

Nand Lal Vs State of Hp and Others — Himachal Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶2

CWP No.2729 of 2025 Date of Decision: 06.08.2025

¶3

____________________________________ Nand Lal	___________________ …….Petitioners
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh & others	… Respondents
____________________________________ Coram:	___________________

¶4

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.

¶5

Whether approved for reporting?¹

¶6

For the Petitioner: Mr. P.P.Chauhan, Advocate (through video conferencing). For the Respondents : Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents/State. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral):

¶7

Learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment dated 23.07.2025 passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No. 3168 of 2025 titled as Harish Kumar and others vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

¶8

and others.

¶9

Having perused the averments contained in the petition, especially relief clause vis-à-vis judgment dated 23.07.2025 passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Harish Kumar’s case (supra),

¶10

1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶11

¶12

this Court finds that case of the petitioner is identical to the aforesaid case decided by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Vide aforesaid judgment, this Court has already dealt with all the points raised in the instant petition and as such, respondents can be directed to decide the case of the petitioner in light of the aforesaid judgment rendered by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

¶13

3. Consequently, In view of the above, the directions contained in the aforesaid judgment rendered by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Harish Kumar’s case (supra) are ordered to be made mutatis mutandis applicable in the present case for all intents and purposes.

¶14

In the aforesaid terms, present petition is disposed of alongwith pending application(s), if any.

¶15

(Sandeep Sharma), Judge

¶16

August 06,2025 (shankar)

Nand Lal v. State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nand Lal v. State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jeeva Nand @ Jiva Nand Vs State of Hp

Manju Bakshi Vs Rohan Chand Thakur and Anr.

Hem Lata Vs the State of Hp and Others

Sanyogita Devi Vs State of Hp and Others

Balbir Singh and Another Vs Rakesh Kanwar

Leelam Kumari Vs the State of Hp and Others