Goverdhan Lal v. the State of Hp and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Keywords: Goverdhan Lal; State of H.P.; CWP No.19057 of 2025; High Court of Himachal Pradesh; Sandep Sharma (Judge); disposal before notices without merits; pending representation Annexure P-9; competent authority; six-week time-bound direction; opportunity of hearing; detailed speaking order; Madan Lal Sharma v. State of H.P., CWP No.3341 of 2019 (04.09.2021) relied on; liberty reserved; pending applications disposed. Subject matter of the representation is not disclosed in the judgment.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the respondents to consider and decide the pending representation (Annexure P-9) expeditiously, preferably within six weeks, affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing and passing a detailed speaking order in light of the judgment in Madan Lal Sharma (supra); liberty reserved to pursue further appropriate proceedings if still aggrieved; pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.