Dismissed¶24

Ram Dutt v. the State of Hp and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC15 Dec 2025CWP/18132/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Ram Dutt v. State of H.P and another; CWP No.18132 of 2025; High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla; decided 15.12.2025; Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J.; regularization w.e.f. 2014; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to file afresh with supporting documents; salary cheque dated 08.12.2025; Government Degree College Kumarsain; certificate of 2016; CMP No. 30672/2025; Annexure P-2.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh in accordance with law alongwith supporting documents in furtherance of the relief claimed. ¶24

Ram Dutt Vs the State of Hp and Others — Himachal Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶2

CWP No.18132 of 2025

¶3

Decided on: 15.12.2025

¶4

------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ram Dutt …..Petitioner

¶5

Versus State of H.P and another .....Respondents

¶6

------------------------------------------------------------------------Coram

¶7

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

¶8

Whether approved for reporting?¹

¶9

For the Petitioner: Mr.S.D.Gill, Advocate.

¶10

For the Respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General.

¶11

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

¶12

CMP No. 30672/2025

¶13

In view of averments made in the application,

¶14

prayer is accepted. The document in form of photocopy of a cheque dated 08.12.2025 appended therewith as Annexure P-2 is taken on record. Application stands disposed of.

¶15

CWP No.18132/2025

¶16

The grievance of the petitioner was noticed as

¶17

under in the order passed in this writ petition on 24.11.2025:-

¶18

“Petitioner seeks regularization with the assertion that he is continuing with respondents with effect from the year, 2014, however, but for

¶19

1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.

¶20

¶21

the certificate issued in the year 2016, there is no document on record suggesting that petitioner is continuing as on date. Confronted with this, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is allowed two weeks time to place on record document evidencing petitioner’s continuation as on date. List on 15.12.2025.”

¶22

2. Pursuant to the above order, the petitioner has placed on record alongwith an application, photocopy of a cheque dated 08.12.2025 statedly issued to him by the Principal, Government Degree College, Kumarsain as salary for the month of November, 2025. As noticed in the previous order passed in this petition, the petitioner seeks regularization w.e.f. year, 2014. Save and except the aforesaid cheque, statedly in form of salary to the petitioner for the month of November, 2025 and certificate issued to the petitioner in the year, 2016, there is still no other document on record. The relief prayed for by the petitioner cannot be granted to him on the basis of documents placed on record. Confronted with above, at this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh in accordance with law alongwith supporting documents in furtherance of relief claimed by the petitioner.

¶23

¶24

3. Granting such permission, petition is dismissed

¶25

as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if

¶26

any, to also stand disposed of.

¶27

December 15, 2025 yogesh

¶28

Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge