Disposed¶9

Shammi Kumar v. the State of Hp and Another

Himachal Pradesh HC17 Nov 2025CWP/17781/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Identical-case disposal: High Court of Himachal Pradesh holds Shammi Kumar's CWP No.17781 of 2025 squarely covered by the Coordinate Bench judgment dated 29.11.2024 in Mohit Sharma and Another v. State of Himachal Pradesh and Others (CWP No.1638 of 2024); directions of that judgment applied mutatis mutandis; writ petition disposed of 17.11.2025 by Sandeep Sharma, J. Keywords: mutatis mutandis, coordinate bench precedent, covered-by-precedent disposal, writ petition disposed.

What did the court decide?

Directions of the Coordinate Bench judgment dated 29.11.2024 in CWP No.1638 of 2024 (Mohit Sharma) made applicable mutatis mutandis to the petitioner's case; petition disposed of along with pending application(s), if any. ¶9

Shammi Kumar Vs the State of Hp and Another — Himachal Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶2

CWP No.17781 of 2025 Date of Decision: 17.11.2025

¶3

_______________________ Shri Shammi Kumar State of Himachal Pra	______________________________________________ ……...Petitioner Versus desh & Ors. …....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice S Whether approved for	andeep Sharma, Judge. reporting?
For the Petitioner:	Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate.
For the respondents: _________________________	Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocate General. __________________________________________________

¶4

Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)

¶5

Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment dated 29.11.2024 passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.1638 of 2024, titled Mohit Sharma and Another vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Others.

¶6

Having perused the averments contained in the petition, especially relief clause vis-à-vis judgment dated 29.11.2024 passed by Coordinate Bench of this Court in Mohit Sharma’s case (supra), this Court finds that case of the petitioner is identical to the aforesaid case decided by Coordinate Bench of this Court. Vide aforesaid judgment, this Court has already dealt with all the points raised in the instant petition and as such, respondents can be directed to decide the case of

¶7

¶8

the petitioners in light of the aforesaid judgment rendered by Coordinate Bench of this Court.

¶9

Consequently, In view of the above, the directions contained in the aforesaid judgment rendered by Coordinate Bench of this Court in Mohit Sharma’s case (supra) are ordered to be made mutatis mutandis applicable in the present case for all intents and purposes. In the aforesaid terms, present petition is disposed of alongwith pending application(s), if any.

¶10

November 17, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (sunil) Judge

Shammi Kumar v. the State of Hp and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shammi Kumar v. the State of Hp and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rana Singh Vs the State of Hp and Others

Inder Pal and Another Vs the State of Hp and Others

Poonam Kumari and Others Vs the State of Hp and Others

Mahesh Raj Vs State of Hp and Anr.

Jagar Nath and Another Vs the State of Hp and Others

Devender Kumar Vs the UOI and Another