Raj Kumar v. the State of Hp and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Undecided representation (Annexure P-1 dated 01.09.2025); direction to competent authority to consider and decide representation; time-bound disposal within six weeks; communication of order to petitioner; applicability of Madan Lal Sharma Vs. State of H.P. & Anr. (CWP No. 3341 of 2019, decided 04.09.2021); State of H.P.; writ petition disposed without examining merits; pending miscellaneous applications disposed. Bench: Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. Counsel: Anuja Mehta (petitioner), Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General (respondents).
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of; respondents/competent authority directed to consider and decide the petitioner's representation dated 01.09.2025 (Annexure P-1) in accordance with law, taking into consideration the Madan Lal Sharma judgment, within a period of six weeks, and to communicate the order so passed to the petitioner; pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.