Swati Sharma v. State of Hp and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Himachal Pradesh High Court, Shimla; single Judge (Ajay Mohan Goel, J.), oral common order dated 08.01.2025 disposing of six writ petitions (Poonam Kumari, Ambika Sharma, Poonam Kanwar, Alzeria Rana, Sulochna Devi and Swati Sharma v. State of Himachal Pradesh and another). Court did not adjudicate merits; directed competent Authority to decide petitioners' representations (Annexure P-5) within 12 weeks by speaking order in accordance with law, considering averments and any judgments relied upon. Keywords: representation, competent authority, speaking order, twelve weeks, mandamus, disposal.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the competent Authority to decide the petitioners' representations (Annexure P-5) within twelve weeks, in light of the averments made therein and the judgment(s) relied upon by the petitioners, if any, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of accordingly.