Disposed¶11

Akash Sagar @ Azad v. the State of Hp and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC11 Sept 2025CWP/14680/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Time-bound direction to State to decide parole application; CWP; Himachal Pradesh High Court; Justice Virender Singh; oral order; notice waived by Deputy Advocate General; liberty to approach Court after decision; miscellaneous applications disposed; Akash Sagar @ Azad v. State of H.P.; 5-day timeline; 2025:HHC:31286.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondents/State to decide the petitioner's parole application within 5 days from the date of the order, with liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court thereafter if need arises; pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. ¶11

Akash Sagar @ Azad Vs the State of Hp and Others — Himachal Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

. ( 2025:HHC:31286 )

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No.14680 of 2025 Date of Decision: 11.09.2025 Akash Sagar @ Azad …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …..Respondents Coram:

¶3

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge.

¶4

Whether approved for reporting?¹

¶5

For the Petitioner	: Mr. Panku Advocate.	Ch	audhary,
For the Respondents	: Mr. Mohinder	Zhar	aick and Mr.
	H.S. Rawat,	Ad	ditional
	Advocates G	enera	l, with Mr.
	Rohit Sharma	and	Ms. Ranjna
	Patial, Dep General.	uty	Advocates

¶6

Virender Singh, Judge (Oral)

¶7

Notice. Ms. Ranjna Patial, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents/State.

¶8

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be content if directions are issued to the respondents/State to decide the matter, with regard to the parole, within the stipulated period.

¶9

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶10

. ( 2025:HHC:31286 )

¶11

In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of, at this stage, by directing the respondents to decide the matter, regarding the parole application of the petitioner, within a period of 5 days, from today.

¶12

Needless to say that after the decision of the said application, the petitioner would be at liberty to approach this Court, if need so arises.

¶13

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall

¶14

also stand disposed of.

¶15

(Virender Singh) Judge

¶16

September 11, 2025

¶17

(subhash)

Akash Sagar @ Azad v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akash Sagar @ Azad v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ved Vyas Vs State of Hp and Ors.

Raj Kumar Vs Himachal Pradesh Gramin Bani and Anr.

Ajay Soni Vs State of Hp and Ors.

Abdul Basit Vs State of Hp

Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited Vs Sanjeev Kumar

State of Hp Vs Sahab Ram