Dismissed¶26

Sanjay Prakash v. the State of Hp and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC6 Mar 2025CWP/1432/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petitions; dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to file afresh; Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024; State of H.P.; government employees recruitment and conditions of service; Parma Nand; Sanjay Prakash; Yogesh Kumar; Kishori Lal; Chanchal Kumari; Sushma Kumari; Yogesh; Sweety Kapalta; Amit Sharma; Purnima; Premlata; Asha Kumari; Arti Kaistha; Parkash Chand; Gaurav Sharma; Rajender Kumar; Deepa Thapa; Mukesh Kumar; CWP 2025; HP High Court Shimla; Jyotsna Rewal Dua; pending miscellaneous applications disposed.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal permitted with liberty to file afresh, in accordance with law, inter alia assailing the Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024; pending miscellaneous applications disposed of.

Sanjay Prakash Vs the State of Hp and Others — Himachal Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶26

Issue for consideration

Whether, in view of the enactment of the Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024 after the filing of these writ petitions, the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the petitions with liberty to file afresh, in accordance with law, assailing the said enactment.

¶25

Court's answer

Liberty granted to the petitioners to withdraw the writ petitions with liberty to file afresh, in accordance with law, inter alia assailing the Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024; prayer accepted.

¶25

Ratio / Principle

The writ petitions stand dismissed as withdrawn, and pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of.

¶26

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla (Single Bench - Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge), decided 06.03.2025; approved for reporting (reporters of local papers may see the judgment - yes). Batch of eighteen connected civil writ petitions (lead matter CWP No.1380/2025, Parma Nand v. State of H.P.; connected matters CWP Nos.1430, 1432, 1434, 1436, 1438, 1440, 1442, 1444, 1446, 1448, 1450, 1452, 1454, 1456, 1458, 1460 and 1462 of 2025 - petitioners Sanjay Prakash, Yogesh Kumar, Kishori Lal, Chanchal Kumari, Sushma Kumari, Yogesh, Sweety Kapalta, Amit Sharma, Purnima, Premlata, Asha Kumari, Arti Kaistha, Parkash Chand, Gaurav Sharma, Rajender Kumar, Deepa Thapa and Mukesh Kumar). Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submitted that, owing to post-filing developments, specifically the enactment of the Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024, the writ petitions could not proceed in their present form, and prayed for withdrawal with liberty to file afresh, in accordance with law, inter alia assailing that enactment. Prayer accepted: petitions dismissed as withdrawn with such liberty; pending miscellaneous applications disposed of. No adjudication on merits.

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶2

CWP No.1380/2025 alongwith connected matters Decided on: 06.03.2025

¶3

1. CWP No.1380/2025

¶4

Parma Nand …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents.

¶5

2. CWP No.1432/2025

¶6

Sanjay Prakash …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents.

¶7

3. CWP No.1430/2025

¶8

Yogesh Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents.

¶9

4. CWP No.1434/2025

¶10

Kishori Lal …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents.

¶11

5. CWP No.1436/2025

¶12

Chanchal Kumari …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents.

¶13

6. CWP No.1438/2025 Sushma Kumari …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents.

¶14

7. CWP No.1440/2025

¶15

Yogesh …Petitioner

¶16

Versus

¶17

		2
	State of H.P. & Ors.		.…Respondents.
8.	CWP No.1442/2025
	Sweety Kapalta	Versus	…Petitioner
	State of H.P. & Ors.		.…Respondents.
9.	CWP No.1444/2025
	Amit Sharma	Versus	…Petitioner
	State of H.P. & Ors.		.…Respondents.
10.	CWP No.1446/2025
	Purnima	Versus	…Petitioner
	State of H.P. & Ors.		.…Respondents.
11.	CWP No.1448/2025
	Premlata	Versus	…Petitioner
	State of H.P. & Ors.		.…Respondents.
12.	CWP No.1450/2025
	Asha Kumari	Versus	…Petitioner
	State of H.P. & Anr.		.…Respondents.
13.	CWP No.1452/2025
	Arti Kaistha	Versus	…Petitioner
	State of H.P. & Ors.		.…Respondents.
14.	CWP No.1454/2025

¶18

¶19

Parkash Chand	Versus	…Petitioner
State of H.P. & Ors.		.…Respondents.
15. CWP No.1456/2025
Gaurav Sharma	Versus	…Petitioner
State of H.P. & Anr.		.…Respondents.
16. CWP No.1458/2025
Rajender Kumar	Versus	…Petitioner
State of H.P. & Ors.		.…Respondents.
17. CWP No.1460/2025
Deepa Thapa	Versus	…Petitioner
State of H.P. & Anr.		.…Respondents.
18. CWP No.1462/2025
Mukesh Kumar	Versus	…Petitioner
State of H.P. & Ors. ………………………	…………	.…Respondents. …………………………………………….
*Coram*
*Ms. Justice Jyotsn*	*a Rewal*	*Dua, Judge.*
Whether approved	for repor	ting?¹
For the petitioner(s	):	Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate, proxy counsel, Mr. Virbahadur Verma, Advocate.

¶20

1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes

¶21

¶22

For the respondent(s):

¶23

Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General.

¶24

Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that due to developments that have taken place post the filing of the writ petitions, more specifically the enactment, i.e. the Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024, the writ petitions, in their present form, cannot proceed ahead, therefore, the petitioner(s) be permitted to withdraw the present writ petitions with liberty to file afresh, in accordance with law, inter alia , assailing the aforesaid enactment. Prayer is accepted.

¶26

Granting such liberty, the present petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

¶27

Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge

¶28

06^th March, 2025(rohit)

Sanjay Prakash v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Prakash v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Milap Chand Vs State of Hp and Others

Awinash Kumar and Others Vs State of Hp and Others

Ravi Kant Vs the State of Hp and Others

Yogesh Vs the State of Hp and Others

Deepa Thapa Vs the State of Hp and Others

Parkash Chand Sharma Vs Cskhpkv and Another