Disposed¶14

Desh Raj v. the Cskhpkvv

Himachal Pradesh HC16 Sept 2025CWP/14147/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single-judge oral judgment applying a coordinate-bench precedent mutatis mutandis. Keywords: Sh. Desh Raj (petitioner); CSKHPKVV (respondent); CWP No.14147 of 2025; Sandeep Sharma J.; decision date 16.09.2025; reliance on judgment dated 03.09.2025 in CWP No.10312 of 2024, Sarup Chand vs. Chaudhary Shrawan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya; case held identical/squarely covered; directions made applicable mutatis mutandis; petition disposed of with pending applications.

What did the court decide?

Directions contained in the judgment dated 03.09.2025 of the Coordinate Bench in CWP No.10312 of 2024 (Sarup Chand) made applicable mutatis mutandis to the petitioner's case; petition disposed of along with pending application(s), if any. ¶14

Desh Raj Vs the Cskhpkvv — Himachal Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶14

Issue for consideration

Whether the case of the petitioner is covered by the judgment dated 03.09.2025 passed by the Coordinate Bench in CWP No.10312 of 2024 (Sarup Chand) such that the directions contained therein can be made applicable mutatis mutandis to the present petition.

¶7

Court's answer

On perusing the averments contained in the petition, especially the relief clause, vis-a-vis the judgment dated 03.09.2025 of the Coordinate Bench, this Court found the case of the petitioner identical to the case decided in Sarup Chand (CWP No.10312 of 2024), and observed that no prejudice shall be caused to either party by applying its directions.

¶8

Ratio / Principle

The directions contained in the judgment rendered by the Coordinate Bench in Sarup Chand's case (CWP No.10312 of 2024, dated 03.09.2025) were ordered to be made mutatis mutandis applicable in the present case for all intents and purposes.

¶13

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

CWP No.14147 of 2025, High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla (decided 16.09.2025, Sandeep Sharma J., oral): Learned counsel for both sides were ad idem that the petitioner's case was squarely covered by the judgment dated 03.09.2025 of a Coordinate Bench in CWP No.10312 of 2024, titled Sarup Chand vs. Chaudhary Shrawan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya. Having perused the averments and relief clause of the petition against that judgment, the Court found the petitioner's case identical to the case decided therein, holding that no prejudice would be caused to either party if its directions were applied. Accordingly, the directions contained in the Sarup Chand judgment were ordered to be made mutatis mutandis applicable in the present case for all intents and purposes, and the petition was disposed of along with pending application(s), if any.

¶1

2025:HHC:31764

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶3

CWP No.14147 of 2025

¶4

Date of Decision: 16.09.2025

¶5

_______________________________________________________ Sh. Desh Raj …….Petitioner Versus CSKHPKVV ….Respondent _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?¹ For the Petitioner: Mr. Dushyant Dadwal and Mr. Shashwat Dadwal, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr. Janesh Mahajan, Advocate.

¶6

____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral):

¶7

Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment dated 03.09.2025 passed by Coordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.10312 of 2024, titled Sarup Chand vs. Chaudhary Shrawan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya .

¶8

Having perused the averments contained in the petition, especially relief clause vis-à-vis judgment dated 03.09.2025 passed by Coordinate Bench of this Court in Sarup Chand’s case (supra), this Court finds that case of the petitioner is identical to the aforesaid case decided by Coordinate Bench of this Court. Vide aforesaid judgment,

¶9

this Court has already dealt with all the points raised in the instant petition and as such, no prejudice, if any, shall be caused to either of 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶10

2025:HHC:31764

¶11

¶12

the parties in case directions contained in Sarup Chand’s case (supra) are ordered to be made mutatis mutandis applicable in the case at hand.

¶13

Consequently, In view of the above, the directions contained in the aforesaid judgment rendered by Coordinate Bench of this Court in Sarup Chand’s case (supra) are ordered to be made mutatis mutandis applicable in the present case for all intents and purposes.

¶14

In the aforesaid terms, present petition is disposed of alongwith pending application(s), if any.

¶15

(Sandeep Sharma), Judge

¶16

September 16, 2025

¶17

(Rajeev Raturi)

Desh Raj v. the Cskhpkvv

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Desh Raj v. the Cskhpkvv

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nirmala Devi and Others Vs the State of Hp and Others

Kamal Kumar Vs the State of Hp and Others

Vinod Kumar Vs the State of Hp and Others

Pooja Pundir Vs the State of Hp and Others

Brahmi Devi Vs the State of Hp and Another

Dharm Singh Vs the State of Hp and Others