Sahil Khan Vs State of Hp

2025:HHC:43729

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.

	Cr. MP (M) No.	: 2888 of 2025
	Decided on	: 16.12.2025
Sahil Khan		…Applicant
	Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh		…Respondent

¶4

Coram

¶5

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge.

¶6

Whether approved for reporting?¹

¶7

For the applicant : Mr. Rakesh Chaudhary and Mr. Panku Chaudhary, Advocates.

¶8

For the respondent : Mr. Tejasvi Sharma, Mr. Mohinder Zharaick, Mr. H.S. Rawat, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Rohit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, assisted by HC Vikas Chaudhary No. 01, Police Station Paonta Sahib, District Sirmour, H.P.

¶9

Virender Singh, Judge

¶10

ApplicantSahil Khan has filed the present application, under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as the 'BNSS'), with a prayer to release him on bail, during the pendency of trial, arising out of FIR No. 206 of 2025,

¶11

1 Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

¶12

2 2025:HHC:43729

¶13

dated 12.09.2025, under Sections 15 & 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act ,

¶14

(hereinafter referred to as the ‘ND&PS Act’), registered with Police Station Paonta Sahib, District Sirmour, H.P.

¶15

According to the applicant, he is innocent person and has falsely been implicated, by the police, in the present case. According to him, he has no connection, whatsoever, with the offences, for which, he has been named as accused, as well as, arrested, by the police.

¶16

As per the applicant, the alleged recovery does not fall within the definition of commercial quantity, as such, rigors of Section 37 of ND&PS Act are not applicable. Investigation is also stated to be complete, in this case.

¶17

The applicant has earlier tried his luck by moving bail application No. 114 of 2025, before learned Special Judge, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmour, H.P., however, his application has been dismissed, vide order dated 25.10.2025. Thereafter, the applicant has filed bail application bearing Cr.MP(M) No. 2789 of 2025, before this Court, which was withdrawn due to some technical defect

¶18

3 2025:HHC:43729

¶19

in the application, with liberty to file afresh, vide order dated 03.12.2025.

¶20

Apart from the present case, following three

¶21

other cases are pending against the applicant:

¶22

FIR No. 120 of 2017, dated 04.12.2017, under Sections 341, 143 of IPC, Police Station Majra, District Sirmaur, H.P.;

¶23

FIR No. 175 of 2019, dated 08.06.2019, under Sections 341, 323, 143 of IPC, Police Station Puruwala, District Sirmaur, H.P.; and

¶24

FIR No. 114 of 2024, dated 22.07.2024, under Section 20 of ND&PS Act, Police Station Puruwala, District Sirmaur, H.P.

¶25

On the basis of the above facts, Mr. Rakesh Chaudhary and Mr. Panku Chaudhary, learned counsel appearing for the applicant, have given certain undertakings, to which, the applicant is ready to abide by, in case, the applicant is ordered to be released on bail, during the pendency of the trial.

¶26

When put to notice, the police has filed the status report, disclosing therein, that on 12.09.2025, HC Anil Tomar No. 645, I.O., Special Detection Team, Sub Division Paonta Sahib, along with other police officials, was on patrolling duty, as well as, duty to detect the crime relating to excise etc. in the area of Sub Division Paonta

¶27

4 2025:HHC:43729

¶28

Sahib. At about 2:45 pm, while on patrolling, when he reached at Behral forest, near Lal Dhank, then, he received a secret information qua the fact that at Lal Dhank near Haryana border, in the area of Himachal Pradesh, a white coloured Swift car bearing temporary No. T0925HP5600J, has been parked.

¶29

7.1 As per the information, three persons namely, Lovepreet @ Punjabi son of Praveen Kumar, resident of Amritsar; Ankush son of Praveen Kumar, resident of Amritsar; and Sahil Khan son of Sharafat Ali (applicant), resident of Puruwala, were selling bhukki/churapost, to the truck drivers, there and in case, they were nabbed, large quantity of bhukki/churapost could be recovered.

¶30

7.2 According to the I.O., in case, he obtains search warrants or authorization letter, in that situation, delay could be caused and contraband could be removed from there. The said information was found to be authentic and reliable, as such, he has prepared the information under Section 42(2) of ND&PS Act and submitted the same to SDPO Paonta Sahib.

¶31

5 2025:HHC:43729

¶32

7.3 Thereafter, the I.O. proceeded towards Lal Dhank side. Meanwhile, from Paonta Sahib side, a Swift car being driven by its driver, came there. The I.O. signalled to stop the said vehicle. Consequently, driver stopped the vehicle. I.O. apprised him about the secret information and the driver of the said vehicle, disclosed his name as Pawan Chaudhary son of Sh. Mukandi Lal. He was associated in the police team and thereafter, they reached at the spot.

¶33

7.4 At about 3:30 pm, when, the police team reached at the spot, and when, they stopped their car, one person sitting on the driver seat of vehicle No. T0925HP5600J, started the vehicle. Other person fled away downside in the bushes and third person removed a plastic sack from the dickey of the car and threw it on the side of the road. The said person was nabbed with the help of police officials, whereas the person, on wheel, drove away the vehicle No. T0925HP5600J, towards Haryana side.

¶34

7.5 The person, who was nabbed, on inquiry, disclosed his name as Ankush son of Sh. Praveen Kumar.

¶35

6 2025:HHC:43729

¶36

Ankush was apprised about the secret information and thereafter, the plastic sack was searched, after giving the personal search to the said person by the I.O. When, the plastic sack was opened, the same was found containing brown coloured powdered substance, which was in the plastic envelope. On the basis of experience, the said substance was found to be poppy husk. Total 26 packets were found. On weighment, the weight of the above plastic packets was found to be 13.175 kg.

¶37

7.6 When, Ankush was inquired about the person, who has fled away, he has disclosed that the person, who had run towards bushes, is his brother Lovepreet @ Punjabi and the person, who fled away with the vehicle is Sahil son of Sh. Sharafat Ali (applicant). Since, it has been found that Ankush, Lovepreet and Sahil (applicant), were having 13.175 kg poppy husk, in their possession, as such, offences under Sections 15 and 29 of the ND&PS Act were found to have been committed. Rukka was prepared and same was submitted to police station, upon which, FIR in question has been registered.

¶38

7 2025:HHC:43729

¶39

7.7 Ankush was arrested on 12.09.2025, at 10:10 pm. During investigation, the person, who fled away from there, namely Sahil (applicant), was nabbed, on 14.09.2025 from Behedewala and was arrested. Thereafter, the proceedings under Section 52A of ND&PS Act were got conducted and sample was sent for chemical analysis to SFSL Junga. After receiving the positive report from SFSL Junga, chargesheet has been filed against Ankush and Sahil (applicant).

¶40

7.8 According to the police, brother of accused Ankush, is yet to be arrested and vehicle No. T0925HP5600J is yet to be recovered.

¶41

7.9 According to the police, apart from the present case, three more cases are found to have been registered against the applicant, i.e. case FIR No. 120/2017, dated 04.12.2017, under Sections 143, 341 of IPC, registered with Police Station Majra; FIR No. 175/2019, dated 08.06.2019, under Sections 341, 323, 341, Police Station Puruwala; and FIR No. 114/2024, dated 22.07.2024, under Section 20 of ND&PS Act.

¶42

8 2025:HHC:43729

¶43

On the basis of above facts, a prayer has been made to dismiss the application.

¶44

Heard.

¶45

The contraband allegedly recovered in the present case, does not fall, within the definition of the ‘commercial quantity’, as such, rigors of Section 37 of ND&PS Act are not applicable, in the present case.

¶46

Once, it has been held that the rigors of Section 37 of the ND&PS Act are not applicable, in that eventuality, the presumption of innocence is still available to the applicant, as the bail application cannot be rejected merely as a matter of punishment, since, pretrial punishment is prohibited under the law.

¶47

In the present case, investigation is complete and the police has submitted the challan, in the competent Court of law. This fact is sufficient to demonstrate that the custodial interrogation of the applicant is no longer required by the police.

¶48

Even otherwise, the bail application cannot be rejected, as a matter of punishment, as, the punishment can only be inflicted, after the conclusion of trial and in the

¶49

9 2025:HHC:43729

¶50

present case, the chances of commencement and conclusion of trial against the applicant, in near future, are not so bright. As such, he cannot be kept in judicial custody, that too, for the indefinite period.

¶51

Coming to the registration of three cases against the applicant, as highlighted in the status report, are concerned, admittedly, in none of the cases, the applicant has been convicted by the competent Court of Law.

¶52

Moreover, the status report is totally silent about the fact whether any effort has been made by the police to get the bail granted to the applicant in the said cases, by the competent Court of Law, cancelled.

¶53

The apprehension that coaccused Lovepreet Singh @ Punjabi is yet to be arrested by the police, is too short to decline the relief, for which, the applicant is entitled to. Moreover, the chances of commencement and conclusion of the trial against the applicant, in near future, are not so bright, as the case is listed for 07.01.2026, for consideration on charge.

¶54

10 2025:HHC:43729

¶55

Furthermore, the applicant is also entitled for grant of bail on the basis of parity, as, his coaccused, namely Ankush Bawa, has already been released on bail, by this Court, vide order dated 28.11.2025, passed in Cr.MP(M) No. 2708 of 2025, titled as ‘Ankush Bawa Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh’.

¶56

The applicant is permanent resident of District Sirmaur, as such, it cannot be apprehended that in case, he is ordered to be released on bail, he may not be available for the trial.

¶57

Considering all these facts, this Court is of the view that the bail application is liable to be allowed and is accordingly allowed.

¶58

Consequently, the applicant is ordered to be released, on bail, during the pendency of trial, arising out of FIR No. 206 of 2025, dated 12.09.2025, under Sections 15 & 29 of the ND&PS Act, registered with Police Station Paonta Sahib, District Sirmour, H.P., on his furnishing personal bonds in the sum of Rs.50,000/, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.

¶59

11 2025:HHC:43729

¶60

This order, however, shall be subject to the

¶61

following conditions:

¶62

“a) The applicant shall regularly attend the trial Court on each and every date of hearing and if prevented by any reason to do so, seek exemption from appearance by filing the appropriate application;

¶63

b) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence nor hamper the investigation of the case in any manner whatsoever;

¶64

c) The applicant shall not make any inducement, threat or promises to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or the Police Officer, and

¶65

d) The applicant shall not leave the territory of India without the prior permission of the Court.”

¶66

Any of the observations, made hereinabove, shall not be taken as an expression of opinion, on the merits of the case, as these observations, are confined, only, to the disposal of the present bail application.

¶67

It is made clear that the respondentState is at liberty to move an appropriate application, in case, any of the bail conditions, is found to be violated by the applicant.

¶68

The Registry is directed to forward a soft copy of the bail order to the Superintendent of Jail, Model Central Jail Nahan, District Sirmaur, H.P., through email, with a

¶69

12 2025:HHC:43729

¶70

direction to enter the date of grant of bail in the eprison software.

¶71

In case, the applicant is not released within a period of seven days from the date of grant of bail, the Superintendent of Jail, Model Central Jail Nahan, District Sirmaur, H.P., is directed to inform this fact to the Secretary, DLSA, Sirmaur, H.P. The Superintendent of Jail, Model Central Jail Nahan, District Sirmaur, H.P., is further directed that if the applicant fails to furnish the bail bonds, as per the order passed by this Court, within a period of one month from today, then, the said fact be submitted to this Court.

¶72

( Virender Singh ) Judge

¶73

16^th December, 2025

¶74

(Pramod Kumar)

¶75

Digitally signed by RAJNI Date: RAJNI 2025.12.16 15:03:33 +0530

Sahil Khan v. State of Hp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sahil Khan v. State of Hp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jagar Nath and Ors. Vs State of Hp and Anr.

Taj Mohammad Vs State of Hp

Mehar Chand Vs Led Ram (since deceased) through LRs

Khem Raj Vs Narcotics Control Bureau

Lucky Vs State of Hp

Ganpatt Vs State of Hp