Dismissed¶8

Deepak v. State of Hp

Himachal Pradesh HC4 Mar 2025CRMPM/234/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Deepak v. State of H.P., Cr.MP(M) No. 234 of 2025, High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla, decision dated 04.03.2025 by Vacation Judge Rakesh Kainthla. Petition dismissed as withdrawn at the instance of counsel (proxy counsel Tanu Chauhan for petitioner; Deputy Advocate General Niyati Thaur for the State); status report taken on record; no statutes cited, no precedents discussed, no issues or holdings; suitable only as a reference for voluntary withdrawal practice, not for citation on merits.

What the court decided

AI extract

Deepak Vs State of Hp — Himachal Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶2

Cr.MP(M) No. 234 of 2025 Date of Decision : 04.03.2025

¶3

Deepak	Versus	....Petitioner
State of H.P.		....Respondent

¶4

Coram

¶5

Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Vacation Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No.

¶6

For the petitioner	: Ms Tanu Chauhan, Advocate, Proxy Counsel.
For the respondent/State	: Ms Niyati Thaur, Deputy Advocate General, with Inspector Vikas Sharma, SHO, Police
	Station Kumarsain, District Shimla, HP.

¶7

Rakesh Kainthla, Vacation Judge (Oral)

¶8

Status report stands filed which is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, submits that she wants to withdraw the present petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.

¶9

(Rakesh Kainthla) Vacation Judge

¶10

4^th March, 2025 (Chander)

Deepak v. State of Hp

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Deepak v. State of Hp

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jai Parkash Vs State of Hp

Het Ram Vs State of Hp

Mohinder Sharma Vs State of Hp

Sada Ram Vs State of Hp

Ajay Kumar Vs State of Hp

Hemraj Vs State of Hp