Dismissed¶16

Ganga Ram v. State of Hp

Himachal Pradesh HC1 Jan 2025CRMPM/2229/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Ganga Ram v. State of Himachal Pradesh; Cr.MP(M) No. 2229 of 2024; 2025:HHC:164; High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla; Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma (Oral); bail petition dismissed as withdrawn on petitioner's unopposed prayer; liberty reserved to file fresh bail application after recording of PWs' evidence or earlier; pending applications disposed of; decided 1st January, 2025; not approved for reporting.

What did the court decide?

Bail petition dismissed as withdrawn at the petitioner's own prayer, with liberty to file a bail application after recording of the PWs' evidence or earlier, if circumstances so necessitate and if desired, in the interests of justice; pending applications, if any, disposed of. ¶16

Ganga Ram Vs State of Hp — Himachal Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2025:HHC:164

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA

¶3

Cr.MP(M) No. 2229 of 2024 Decided on: 1^stJanuary, 2025
__________________________________________________________ Ganga Ram ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh ….Respondent

¶4

Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge

¶5

1 Whether approved for reporting? No

¶6

For the petitioner	: Mr. Adv Adv	Deepak ocate with ocate.	Kaush Mr.	al Senior Abhishek,
For the respondent	: Mr. Add resp	Vishav itional Advo ondent No.	Deep cate 1.	Sharma, General for
	Mr. for	Sanjeev K. respon	Suri dent	, Advocate No.2-
	Com	plainant.

¶7

Ranjan Sharma, Judge (Oral)

¶8

After hearing Mr. Deepak Kaushal Learned

¶9

Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Abhishek, Advocate, for some time, a prayer is made for withdrawing the instant petition with liberty to move application for bail after recording evidence of PW’s [Statement taken on record].

¶10

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶11

2025:HHC:164

¶12

- 2 -

¶13

2. Prayer so made, being innocuous, is not

¶14

opposed by Learned State Counsel as well as Learned Counsel for the victim also.

¶15

3. Accordingly, the instant bail petition is

¶16

dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to

¶17

file a bail application as stated hereinabove or earlier, in case, circumstances so necessitate and if so desired, in

¶18

the interests of justice.

¶19

In aforesaid terms, the bail petition and all

¶20

pending applications, if any, shall disposed of.

¶21

(Ranjan Sharma) Judge

¶22

1^st January, 2025

¶23

( himani )

Ganga Ram v. State of Hp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ganga Ram v. State of Hp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rita Devi Vs State of Hp

Mukesh Kumar Vs Hrtc

Sanjeev Mohd. Vs State of Hp

Mahesh Dutt Sharma Vs State of Hp

Neelam Kumari Vs State of Hp

Rajinder Pall Vs State of Hp