Jai Pal v. State of Hp
Case brief
What is this about?
Jai Pal v. State of H.P.; Cr.MP(M) No.2217 of 2025; decided 16.09.2025 by Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Himachal Pradesh High Court). Interim order dated 08.09.2025 made absolute; status report showed further custodial interrogation of petitioner not required; conditions imposed: no intimidation of witnesses/influencing evidence, attendance at trial upon charge sheet, intimation to SHO/Trial Court before absence of seven continuous days, surrender of passport, furnishing mobile number and social media contacts and abiding by SMS/WhatsApp notices with change intimated within five days. I.O.: HC Deepak Kumar No. 39, P.S. Ramshehar, District Solan. Counsel: Sanjay Bhardwaj for petitioner; Parshant Sen, Deputy Advocate General for the State.
What did the court decide?
Interim order dated 08.09.2025 made absolute in favour of the petitioner, subject to the enumerated conditions (non-intimidation of witnesses, trial attendance, travel/address intimation, surrender of passport, disclosure of mobile and social media contacts); petition disposed of.