Disposed¶6
Jhina Ram Gazta v. Sukh Ram Sharma
Himachal Pradesh HCCRMPM/2162/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Special leave to appeal held not legally required for complainant-applicant, following SC decision in Celestium Financial versus A. Gnanasekaran & Others (Crl.A. Nos. 1868-1870 of 2025); leave application (Cr. MP(M) No. 2162 of 2025) disposed; appeal to be registered; notice to respondent Sukh Ram Sharma returnable 6.11.2025; Judge Virender Singh; advocates Kamesh Kumari vice H.S. Rana for applicant Jhina Ram Gazta.
What did the court decide?
Leave application disposed of on the ground that no special leave to appeal is required; a fresh Cr. Appeal (number left blank) of 2025 was directed to be registered, with notice to the respondent on steps being taken within a week, returnable for 6.11.2025. ¶6