Dismissed¶8

Rajinder Singh and Anr. v. Vikram Singh

Himachal Pradesh HC3 Nov 2025CRMMO/49/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Himachal Pradesh High Court, Shimla; Cr. MMO No. 49 of 2025; petition dismissed as withdrawn at petitioners' counsel's request under instructions; pending miscellaneous application(s) also disposed; Rajinder Singh and another versus Vikram Singh; advocates Gurinder Singh Parmar (petitioners) and Vaibhav Kanwar (respondent); single-judge bench, Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral); decision dated 3.11.2025; no statute, precedent, issue or quantum involved.

What the court decided

AI extract

Rajinder Singh and Anr. Vs Vikram Singh — Himachal Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶2

Cr. MMO No. 49 of 2025 Date of Decision : 3.11.2025

¶3

Rajinder Singh and another	....Petitioners
Versus
Vikram Singh	....Respondent

¶4

Coram

¶5

Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?¹ No.

¶6

For the petitioners	: Mr. Gurinder Advocate.	Singh Parmar,
For the respondent	: Mr. Vaibhav Ka	nwar, Advocate.

¶7

Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral)

¶8

Learned counsel representing the petitioner, under instructions, submits that he wants to withdraw the present petition at this stage. Hence, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if

¶9

any.

¶10

(Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 3^rd November, 2025 (Nikita)

¶11

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

Rajinder Singh and Anr. v. Vikram Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Rajinder Singh and Anr. v. Vikram Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yashpal Sharma and Anr. Vs State of Hp and Anr.

M/S P.K. Enterprises Vs M/S Chaudhary Enterprises through Its Prop.

Jyoti Peris Vs CBI

Raj Chander Negi Vs State of Hp

Mani Lal Vs State of Hp

State Vs Sunil Bharti Rana