Rajan Mishra Vs Chaman Lal

1 ( 2025:HHC:38282 ) .

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA

Cr. Revision No.548 of 2024 Date of Decision: 12.11.2025 Rajan Mishra …Petitioner Versus Chaman Lal …..Respondent Coram:

¶4

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?¹

¶5

For the Petitioner : Petitioner in person with Mr. Rajat Awasthy, Advocate. For the Respondent : Respondent in person with Dr. Sahil Malhotra, Advocate.

¶6

Virender Singh, Judge (Oral)

¶7

Petitioner-Rajan Mishra has filed the present Criminal Revision against the judgment dated 03.06.2024, passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P., (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Appellate Court’), in Criminal Appeal bearing No.25-NL/10 of 2023, titled as ‘Rajan Mishra versus Chaman Lal’.

¶8

By way of judgment dated 03.06.2024, the learned Appellate Court has dismissed the appeal, filed by the petitioner, against the judgment of conviction dated 04.08.2023 and order of sentence dated 23.08.2023, passed by the Court of learned

¶9

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶10

2 ( 2025:HHC:38282 ) .

¶11

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P., (hereinafter called as the ‘trial Court’), in Criminal Case No.395/3 of 2018, titled as ‘Chaman Lal versus Rajan Mishra’.

¶12

Vide judgment of conviction dated 04.08.2023 and order of sentence dated 23.08.2023, the learned trial Court has convicted the petitioner, for the offence, punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NI Act’) and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment, for a period of six months and to pay a compensation of Rs.1,50,000/- to the complainant.

¶13

After dismissal of the appeal by the learned Appellate Court, the present Criminal Revision has been preferred.

¶14

Now, the petitioner has moved Cr.MP No.3602 of 2025, under Section 147 of NI Act, for compounding of offence.

¶15

Statements of the petitioner, as well as, respondent, have been recorded, in which, they have agreed that the dispute, with regard to Cheque No.047030, dated 21.08.2018 has been settled, between the parties.

¶16

Today i.e. 12.11.2025, respondent, has stated, regarding the factum, as to why, he had filed the complaint, against the accused (petitioner), in which, the judgment of

¶17

3 ( 2025:HHC:38282 ) .

¶18

conviction and order of sentence have been passed, which have unsuccessfully been assailed, before the learned Appellate Court. He has also deposed that the matter has been settled with the petitioner.

¶19

The respondent has further deposed that he has no objection, if the present revision petition is allowed and the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the learned trial Court, are ordered to be quashed and set-aside and the petitioner is acquitted from the offence, punishable under Section 138 of NI Act.

¶20

Today, petitioner is also present before this Court and has also stated in the aforesaid terms. He has paid the entire settled amount to the respondent and now nothing is due against him with regard to the cheque in question. He has deposed that on the basis of the compromise, the present petition may be allowed by setting aside the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, referred to above, and he may be acquitted from the offence, punishable under Section 138 of NI Act.

¶21

Apart from this, the petitioner-accused has also given an undertaking that he will deposit the compounding fee, within a period of four weeks from today and in case, he fails to deposit the compounding fee, within the stipulated period, the revision

¶22

4 ( 2025:HHC:38282 ) .

¶23

petition may be treated, as dismissed and in that eventuality, he will surrender before the learned trial Court to undergo the substantive sentence, imposed upon him, by the learned trial Court.

¶24

Considering the statements of the parties, as well as, considering the fact that the matter has been settled between the accused (petitioner) and the complainant, Cr.MP No.3602 of 2025, is allowed and the parties to the lis are permitted to compound the offence.

¶25

Consequently, the present petition is allowed and the judgment of conviction dated 04.08.2023 and order of sentence dated 23.08.2023, passed by the learned trial Court, in Criminal Case No.395/3 of 2018, which have been affirmed by learned Appellate Court, in Criminal Appeal No.25-NL/10 of 2023, vide judgment dated 03.06.2024, are set aside and the petitioner is acquitted from the offence, punishable under Section 138 of the NI Act. His personal and surety bonds are discharged.

¶26

However, this order shall be, subject to the deposit of 7.50% of the cheque amount, as compounding fee. 50% of the amount of compounding fee shall be deposited by the accused with the Member Secretary, H.P. State Legal Services Authority, Shimla, and remaining 50% of the aforesaid amount shall be deposited with

¶27

5 ( 2025:HHC:38282 ) .

¶28

the Chief Justice, Disaster Relief Fund, within a period of four weeks from today.

¶29

It is further clarified that if the petitioner fails to deposit the compounding fee, as ordered by this Court, within a period of four weeks, then, the present petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed, by reviving the judgment of conviction dated 04.08.2023 and order of sentence dated 23.08.2023, passed by learned trial Court and in that eventuality, he shall surrender before the learned trial Court to undergo the substantive sentence, imposed upon him, by the learned trial Court.

¶30

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also

¶31

stand disposed of.

¶32

(Virender Singh) Judge

¶33

November 12, 2025 (subhash)

Rajan Mishra v. Chaman Lal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajan Mishra v. Chaman Lal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Keshav Dutt Shreedhar Vs State of H.P. and Ors.

Shamender Sood Vs Sanjay Dharmaik

Sodhi Ram Vs State of Hp

Kuldeep Singh Vs Hdfc Bank Limited and Anr.

Sumit Vasudeva and Ors. Vs State of Hp and Anr.

Lal Chand Vs State of Hp