Appellants sought withdrawal of a regular second appeal; the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn along with pending miscellaneous applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
RSA No. 140 of 2015 Date of Decision : 10.05.2024
| Rajinder Kumar and another | ....Appellants | |
|---|---|---|
| Versus | ||
| Nirmala Devi and others | ....Respondents |
Coram
Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
| For the appellants | : Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate. |
|---|---|
| For the respondents | : Mr. Rahul Thakur and Ms. Vishali Lakhanpal, Advocates for respondent No.1. |
| None for respondents No. 2 to 10. |
Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral)
Learend counsel for the appellants, under
instructions, submits that he wants to withdraw the present
appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
(Rakesh Kainthla) Judge
10th May, 2024 (Chander)
Rajinder Kumar and another
Nirmala Devi
Rakesh Kainthla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
