Appealed against the disposal of the appeal. Court noted respondent's absence. Condoned delay in filing the appeal based on orders in similar matters and allowed the appeal to be decided on merits to serve the interest of justice.
Application allowed; delay in filing the appeal is condoned; appeal to be decided on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NHAI Vs. Kanshi Ram
OMP(M) No.170/2023
13.06.2024 Present: Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate vice Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant. None for the respondent.
OMP(M) No.170/2023
Despite grant of opportunities, reply by the nonapplicant/respondent has not been filed.
Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant has placed on record copies of orders passed in different OMP(Ms) in different cases instituted by the applicant/appellant involving the same judgment, wherein the delay in filing the appeal has been condoned.
In view of the orders already passed in the similar matters and also taking into consideration the averments made in the application, it would be in the interest of justice, in case the delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the appeal is decided on merits. Accordingly, the application is allowed. Delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
The application to stand disposed of.
Arbitration Appeal No.______/2024
Be registered.
List for consideration on 20.06.2024.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge
13th June, 2024 (rohit)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the appeal may be condoned in the interest of justice given orders in similar matters.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
NHAI
Kanshi Ram
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
