Shyam Verma v. Randeep and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The court noted letters from the Arbitrator regarding an arbitration case that had been disposed of long ago. The court directed that no further orders were necessary as the underlying matter was concluded.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Shyam Verma vs. Randeep & others
OMP No.687 of 2022 in Arb. Case No.70 of 2019
19.07.2024 Present:
None for the petitioner.
Mr. Arsh Rattan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent no.6.
The letters received from the Arbitrator at Flags A & B have been noted. Since the arbitration case itself had been disposed of long back, no further orders are necessary.
( M.S. Ramachandra Rao ) Chief Justice
July 19, 2024’ (vt)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shyam Verma
- respondent
Randeep
Coram
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- OMP/687/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court