Two separate orders: one granting 157 days delay condonation and registering an appeal; the other dismissing the same appeal upon withdrawal without costs.
Stay of the dismissal of the appeal is granted with liberty to the appellant to file a review petition in the Writ Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
LPA No.459 of 2024 Decided on: 12.12.2024
State of HP & Another .....appellants Versus Anil Kumar ...Respondent
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Acting Chief Justice Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge
Whether approved for reporting?1
| For the appellants : Mr. Pranay Pratap Singh, Mr. |
|---|
| Gobind Korla, Additional Advocate |
| Generals and Ms. Priyanka |
| Chauhan, Mr. Arsh Rattan, Mr. |
| Sidharth Jalta, Deputy Advocate |
| Generals. |
| For the respondent : Mr. Rishi Tandon, Advocate. |
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Acting Chief Justice (Oral)
CMP(M) No.1539 of 2024
By medium of this application, the applicants/applicants have sought condonation of 157 days delay that has crept up in filing of the appeal. A perusal of the application discloses sufficient cause which prevented them from filing the appeal within the prescribed period of limitation. Accordingly, the aforesaid delay is condoned. The application stands disposed
of. Appeal be registered.
Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
1
LPA No.459 of 2024
December 12, 2024 ( Satyen Vaidya ) (Yashwant) Judge
State of HP
Anil Kumar
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
