The single appeal filed before the High Court at Shimla is dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner. No substantive legal issues were addressed.
Permission to withdraw the petition was granted, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal along with pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
FAO (FC) No. 36 of 2024 Date of Decision: 12.11.2024
Bhavna Thakur ...Petitioner Versus Mukesh Kumar ...Respondent
Coram
Hon’ble Mr Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge.
Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla , Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Munish Dhatwalia, Advocate. : For the Respondent Mr. Dhananjay, Advocate.
Rakesh Kainthla, Judge
Learned counsel for the appellant, under instructions,
seeks permission to withdraw this petition. Prayer is accepted.
with pending miscellaneous applications, if any.
(Vivek Singh Thakur)
Judge
( Rakesh Kainthla) Judge
12th November, 2024
( saurav pathania )
1
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
Bhavna Thakur
Mukesh Kumar
Vivek Singh Thakur
Rakesh Kainthla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
