Appeal against dismissal of a divorce petition under Section 13(1)(ia)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act. As the sole respondent had died pending appeal, the appeal was held to have lost its efficacy and was dismissed as abated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:HHC:9742
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT
SHIMLA
FAO No.4168 of 2013 Decided on 15th October, 2024
Manju Sharma
…Appellant
Versus
Kushal Kumar Sharma
…Respondent
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?
For the appellant: Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate.
For the respondent: None.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral )
As per the report of the Registry, the sole respondent
is dead.
filed seeking divorce from the respondent, which was denied by
2
2024:HHC:9742
the learned Court below and as now the respondent is dead, as
the appeal has lost its efficacy, the same is ordered to be closed.
Dismissed as abated.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
October 15, 2024 (Vinod)
KUMARBHUPENDER Digitally signed by BHUPENDER KUMARDN: C=IN, O=HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, OU=HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA, Phone=04d8bcd7412dcb18b7b081df02fb3b89ecc4a0c8f8a66ab97285dc56e62d41fe, PostalCode=171001, S=Himachal Pradesh, SERIALNUMBER=2ccc91b5122501da0ce3678b0e2b7bd5fa9b09937769da5501e1f4e7ad448bc5, CN=BHUPENDER KUMARReason: I am approving this document with my legally binding signatureLocation: Date: 2024-10-15 18:27:27
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manju Sharma
Kushal Kumar Sharma
Ajay Mohan Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
