Disposed
Neem Chand Sharma v. State of Hp and Others
Himachal Pradesh HCEX.P./339/2024
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:HHC:8568
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No. 339 of 2024
Decided on: 16.09.2024
Neem Chand .…Petitioner
Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
| For the petitioners : | Ms. Babita Kumari, Advocate. |
|---|---|
| For the respondents : |
Mr. Rajpal Thakur, Addl. AG for respondents No. 1 to 4. |
| : | Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advoate for respondent No. 5. |
| : | Mr. Balram Sharma, DSGI, for respondent No. 6. |
| Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge |
(Oral) |
Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners submits
that the judgment in issue has been complied with in letter and spirit. Accordingly, these proceedings are closed being fully satisfied.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Sept. 16, 2024 Judge (narender)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Neem Chand
State of H.P.
Ajay Mohan Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court