An execution petition was closed after the Authority passed an appropriate order following court directions, with liberty to the petitioner to appeal that order separately.
Proceedings closed with liberty to assail the Authority's order by appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:HHC:4574
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No. 314 of 2023
Decided on: 05.07.2024
Smt. Hima Devi
.…Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. through the Principal Secretary (I&PH) and others …Respondents
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
| For the petitioner : | Ms. Babita Kumari, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. |
|---|---|
| For the respondents : |
Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer fopr respondents No. 1 to 4. |
| : | Mr. Chitranjan K. Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate for respondent No. 5. |
| Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge |
(Oral) |
In view of the fact that appropriate order now
stands passed by the Authority pursuant to the directions passed by the Court, these proceedings are closed, however, with liberty to the petitioner to assail the order passed by the Authority concerned by way of appropriate proceedings, in accordance with law.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) July 05, 2024 Judge (narender)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Smt. Hima Devi
State of H.P. through the Principal Secretary (I&PH) and others
Ajay Mohan Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
