Disposed¶11

Sunita Chauhan v. State of Hp and Anr.

Himachal Pradesh HC12 Aug 2024EX.P./261/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Execution Petition No. 261 of 2024, High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla (2024:HHC:6877), decided 12.08.2024, Justice Ajay Mohan Goel; petitioner Sunita Chauhan v. State of Himachal Pradesh and another; proceedings closed after Competent Authority order regularizing contract-appointment services from initial date with actual benefits from adjudication date; liberty to revive execution for unpassed financial benefits; pending miscellaneous applications disposed.

What did the court decide?

Execution proceedings closed, with liberty reserved to the petitioner to approach the Court for further execution if actual financial benefits are not passed on within a reasonable time; pending miscellaneous applications disposed of accordingly. ¶11

Sunita Chauhan Vs State of Hp and Anr. — Himachal Pradesh HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2024:HHC:6877

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶3

Execution Petition No. 261 of 2024

¶4

Decided on: 12.08.2024

¶5

Sunita Chauhan .…Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Himachal Pradesh and another …Respondents Coram

¶8

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.

¶9

Whether approved for repor	ting?¹
For the petitioner :	Ms. Shivani Tegta, Advocate.
For the respondents :	Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Pushpender Jaswal,
	Additional Advocate General.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge	(Oral)

¶10

Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record the instructions, alongwith which the copy of order passed by the Competent Authority has also been annexed, in terms whereof, now the services of the petitioner have been ordered to be regularized from the initial date of her appointment on contract basis and actual benefits have been ordered as from the date of the adjudication of the petition.

¶11

In these view of the matter, these proceedings are closed, but with liberty to the petitioner that if actual financial benefits are not passed on to them within some reasonable time, they may approach the Court for further execution of the same.

¶12

1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶13

¶14

2024:HHC:6877

¶15

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly.

¶16

(Ajay Mohan Goel) August 12, 2024 Judge (narender)

Sunita Chauhan v. State of Hp and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunita Chauhan v. State of Hp and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hira Singh Vs Hpu and Anr.

Sanjay Kumar Vs State of Hp and Others

Rikki Saini Vs State of Hp and Others

Varsha Kumari Vs State of Hp and Others

Maya Devi Vs State of Hp and Anr.

Roshni Devi Vs State of Hp and Anr.